Top 11 LinkedIn SEO tips

How are people finding you on LinkedIn if they don’t know your name?  What keywords and/or titles are they using?

I have a LinkedIn premium account and can therefore see how people find me. 22% (up from 15% a few months ago) of the people who found my LinkedIn profile found me by my name, firstname and/or lastname.  The next largest hit was 4% (combined) for vendor names mentioned in my profile. However, finding me by those company names has zero value to me – I since removed the vendor names and that 4% disappeared.

How do I want to be found on LinkedIn?  This started my research into LinkedIn SEO tips as LI LinkedIn provides virtually no help here except for one faq.

Your Unique Lense

LinkedIn’s Search results are based on your Profile content and activity.  However, one early and (now) seemingly obviously discovery is everyone searches LinkedIn through their own unique “lense”.  Your lense is the people in your network, your 1st, 2nd, 3rd level connections, group connections and your Industry.  Below is my part of my lense into the LinkedIn population – the 1st level connections.   Image underneath each dot is another cloud of connections (your 2nd level) then each of your 2nd level connections has a cloud of connections under them.  Those 3 layers of cloud connections is part of your unique lense. Because of each person’s unique network, virtually no two persons search results will be identical.

Consider that the value of LinkedIn is ensuring your search results are most relevant to you, delivering search results of people in your network.  If I’m searching for title “CEO” in location “Toronto”, I want my results to start with people in my network, people I have a good chance of knowing, or know someone in common, so I may rapidly connect with that CEO.  That’s the other power of LinkedIn, facilitating rapid connections.

Your unique lense also includes your Industry.  You set your Industry with your profile settings.  My Industry is Information Technology & Services.  Therefore, when I search “CEO” in location “Toronto”, I would expect the results to be of CEO in my industry, vs. CEO’s in the Fishery industry.

Your Profile

Before you embark of SEO Optimizing your LinkedIn profile you need to ask yourself a) how do you want to be found and b) by whom – what keywords / titles would they use?  There are two ways to search LinkedIn profiles, from within LinkedIn itself, and externally via a search engine as your #LI profile is indexed by search engines.

During my research I came upon the following results, from reputable sources.

11 LinkedIn SEO tips

  1. Customized Profile URL with your name.  Keywords in URL are search engine optimized.
  2. Change the standard names for the (up to) 3 website URLs (i.e. from “my company”) to customized names (e.g. Stomphorst.ca) for SEO passing authority. You may want to rename the site within LI to attract your target audience, vs. the actual url name.   BTW, don’t list your employer’s website.
  3. Repeat your professional specialty and keywords many times in your LI profile, however keep in mind LI says “More keywords aren’t always better”.   E.g. If you are a BI Specialist:
    1. Professional Headline: BI Specialist
    2. Summary: I’m a BI Specialist in the….
    3. Current & Past Titles (if/when applicable): BI Specialist
    4. Description within job: I was a BI Specialist ….
    5. Specialties: BI Specialist
    6. Skills & Expertise: BI, business intelligence, business intelligence tools. Insert all the keywords you want to be found from.
  4. Remove non-relevant keywords to eliminate false positives. E.g. I was receiving significant hits (relatively speaking) due to single mentions of “Rypple” and “Intelex” in my profile.  This adds zero value to my profile.  30-60 days after I removed mentions of “Rypple” and “Intelex” from my profile, those search words don’t appear in my “Top Search Keyword” (include screen capture)
  5. Set your profile to Display all information
  6. Set your Industry accordingly
  7. Participate in Group discussions – increases the number of internal links to your profile from within LI, thus strengthening your visibility in search engines.
  8. Answer questions on LI answers – increases the number of internal links to your profile from within LI, thus strengthening your visibility in search engines.
  9. Link to your LI profile on other social sites (i.e. link backs)
  10. Request Recommendations. Have at least 10. Elevates your profile within LI.
  11. Endorsements: LinkedIn isn’t weighing endorsements at this feature’s release in Sept 2012, “but will soon.”  “…the more endorsements for your skills and talents that you get, the more often you’ll appear in search results” according to Dave Kerpen.

Gaming the System

I classify the following suggestions as “gaming the system.”  They likely produce a positive impact, but I can’t corroborate their effectiveness. I don’t use them.

  1. Recognizing that LI users search through their “lense”,  LI will elevate results for connections within their network (i.e. 1st, 2nd, 3rd level connections, groups). Therefore, to be in as many networks as possible and therefore found by as many people as possible, you need to be connected to as many people as possible.  Accept any and all connection requests (I’m breathing in a paper bag as I type this).
  2. Similar to above, this too seems seedy, join as many Groups as possible (50 max).  Join the groups with the largest memberships (where’d that paper bag go?).
  3. Add applications like WordPress to promote your blog and Slideshare.net to promote your slidedecks.
  4. List any media attention in the Honor & Awards section. Obviously include any other honors or awards.
  5. Use the Projects section to promote your whitepapers

Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling Disruptive Products to Mainstream Customers

A must read for anyone in the hi tech industry. Not just for sales and marketing folks, but for product managers and developers. This is an eye opener in how to best sell high tech products.  I only first read this a couple years ago.

Some key takeaways for me:

  • When the company is crossing the chasm, everyone in the company must be focused on crossing, not just the Sales & Marketing groups. You need company unity.
  • Have to show your new technology enables strategic leap forward for your customer.
  • Learned the term Whole Product, The minimum set of products and services needed to fulfill the compelling reason to buy for the target customer. Every high tech company needs to define their œwhole product
  • If the bug report and product enhancement list are not managed properly it will bring the entire development organization to it knees. The whole product manager needs to own the list. Everyday the enhancements list is in the hands of the original pioneers, the company risks making additional development commitments to un-strategic ends. I’ve seen this happen.”

Win – Language that works Today

One of the top 5% of the books I’ve read. Very timely book about the language of business that works today, not 5 years ago. Win is full of learning experiences. It’s a book I keep within reach. I review it often.

Words are a weapon. Used right, they greatly enhance ability to persuade the listener. Luntz provides examples of words & phrases that work today. He also provides popular words & phrases that worked pre-recession which are no longer valued with the post recession population.

One the better quotes I like from Win is “You can accomplish the right thing, in the right order, and the right time, only when the entire organization understands what is important and why.”

If the language your business uses to communicate matters, I highly recommend you read this.

Follow the author at @FrankLuntz

The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brain (with hyperlinks)

The Shallows was an excellent read.  It was also a heavy read.  There were a few chapters that dove into how the brain works.  I wouldn’t classify The Shallows as a pop culture book.

The author walks the reader through many forms of communication and provides an interesting perspective along the way.

CD cover of book

I learned that books, as we know them today (sentences, paragraphs, chapters combined into a book) didn’t come into existence until ~1500s (the written word existed for a preceding 1000-2000 years).  Until then, the written word was a long long continuous run of words, no punctuation, no sentence structure, no paragraph structure.  The innovation of those structures hadn’t yet been envisioned. Books were originally believed to “dumb down” (my words) society; until then we were largely a verbal society.  Magazines were originally believed to replace books.  The disruptive Edison phonograph was also thought to eliminate books as people could conveniently listen to books.  There have been a lot of potential book-displacement technologies over the centuries, but the written book prevails.  Interestingly, I “read” this book via a streaming book service, audiobooks.com, using my smart phone + bluetooth headset in the car.

Will the internet displace the book?  One great quote: the internet isn’t a learning enrichment tool, but an interruption system.  One component of the title’s premise of the book, “Is the internet making us dumb?” speaks towards hyperlinks.  How instead of providing value, hyperlinks cause such a distraction to reading on-line, that we’re unable to extract deep meaning from the text.  Instead of focusing the brain on deep understanding of the material, it’s continually asked to perform mini-evaluations along the way. Example, “should I click that link?”  When we do click, we’ve potentially shifted our brain again into first gear to read some related content. Then again and again, never submerging ourselves into the deep reading mode where we (apparently) comprehend and retain the most. Don’t believe the author, read the same book review here without any hyperlinks – which was easier to read?

The Shallows deserves a second read.

Who should read this book: Internet content creators

The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brain

The Shallows was an excellent read.  It was also a heavy read.  There were a few chapters that dove into how the brain works.  I wouldn’t classify The Shallows as a pop culture book.

The author walks the reader through many forms of communication and provides an interesting perspective along the way.

I learned that books, as we know them today (sentences, paragraphs, chapters combined into a book) didn’t come into existence until ~1500s (the written word existed for a preceding 1000-2000 years).  Until then, the written word was a long long continuous run of words, no punctuation, no sentence structure, no paragraph structure.  The innovation of those structures hadn’t yet been envisioned. Books were originally believed to “dumb down” (my words) society; until then we were largely a verbal society.  Magazines were originally believed to replace books.  The disruptive phonograph was also thought to eliminate books as people could conveniently listen to books.  There have been a lot of potential book-displacement technologies over the centuries, but the written book prevails.  Interestingly, I “read” this book via a streaming book service, audiobooks.com, using my smart phone + bluetooth headset in the car.

Will the internet displace the book?  One great quote: the internet isn’t a learning enrichment tool, but an interruption system.  One component of the title’s premise of the book, “Is the internet making us dumb” speaks towards hyperlinks.  How instead of providing value, hyperlinks cause such a distraction to reading on-line, that we’re unable to extract deep meaning from the text.  Instead of focusing the brain on deep understanding of the material, it’s continually asked to perform mini-evaluations along the way. Example, “should I click that link?”  When we do click, we’ve potentially shifted our brain again into first gear to read some related content. Then again and again, never submerging ourselves into the deep reading mode where we (apparently) comprehend and retain the most. Don’t believe the author, read the same book (URL listed below) embedded with hyperlinks and pictures – which was easier to read?

http://stomphorst.ca/2012/07/26/the-shallows-what-the-internet-is-doing-to-our-brain-with-hyperlinks/

The Shallows deserves a second read.

Who should read this book: Internet content creators

The SPEED of Trust: The One Thing That Changes Everything

Steven Covey does an excellent job at describing how trust can accelerate a company, is an enabler, and how the opposite can cripple one.  The CEO of Deloitte also recommends this book.

A “Must read” book.

Will Facebook’s job board turn LinkedIn into the next Myspace?

I don’t care what anyone says, Facebook is squarely seated in the B2C and friends & family corner. LinkedIn is in the opposing corner, B2B and business. Will they fight?

Facebook has the pocket book and therefore the potential to replace #LI in the long term.

#LI has a good standard product. It could be much better.

A plethora of companies have created apps and are making a living on the Facebook platform. Other than some nifty bolt-ons (Amazon, box.net, events), there are virtually no independent software vendor created LinkedIn apps. I would make it easier for other apps to access #LI data. Why doesn’t #LI allow me to use its users database as the directory for my applications? Why doesn’t LinkedIn Events allow me to a) broadcast a message to All Attendees or b) allow individual attendees message other attendees? #LI is a business communications tool, but as I noted in a previous blog, they’ve buried the functionality to message fellow group members. A step backwards.

In 2009, there were 29 Job apps on Facebook. A quick search today shows up to a few hundred such apps.

A Facebook job board could be the disruptive app that turns #LI into the next Myspace. I love LinkedIn. Time for them to step up their game.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.